I proudly admit that I'm a fan of 3-D. in the 80's brief resurgent of 3-D movies we got titles like "Friday The 13th 3-D" "Jaws 3-D" and "The Amityville Horror 3-D". Seems that every third installment of horror movies were released in 3-D. But, this type of 3-D was really bad. Nothing could conjure a headache faster than wearing those paper red/blue lensed 3-D glasses. this short fad died quickly. Through out the rest of the 80's and 90's, only a small few movies were released in 3-D. The biggest of these was "Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare", fortunately only the last 10 minutes of the movie was in 3-D.
By 2000 a new type of 3-D camera had been developed, thanks most in part by James Cameron. The first of this new generation of 3-D movies were more or less a test for James Cameron. "Journey To The Center Of The Earth 3-D" was the biggest of these test movies and helped Cameron tweak out the the process before filming "Avatar". It doesn't matter if you liked or disliked "Avatar" or if your not a fan of 3-D, you have to admit you had never seen 3-D like that before.
The success of these 3-D movies led to a more bastard form of 3-D. The 2-D to 3-D converon. Filming a movie in regular 2-D and then computer manipulating it into 3-D. This process is much cheaper to produce, and it shows. "Piranha 3-D" "Clash Of The Titans" and "The Last Airbender" are great examples of this process. All have blurry images, ghosting and very unusual depths. Unfortunately, nearly 4 out of 5 3-D movies being released use the 2-D to 3-D converon. There are some out there that are shot in 3-D. "Redent Evil: Afterlife" "Saw 3-D" "Sanctum" and "Drive Angry" all have very sharp and clean edges with depth that is never distracting.When it comes to the best type of 3-D movie it's ealy the CG animated movies. It's much eaer to convert an animated image to 3-D than it is a live action movie. Disney and Pixar have done a fantastic job with their 3-D animated movies.
The way I see it is that 3-D is going to be around a while. It helps your local theater who rely on concesons and on screen advertisements to earn an extra buck on ticket sales. It is much eaer on the eyes to watch and the kids love it. Also, with the release of theater quality 3-D in your home is really going to boost the popularity.
I can personally say that it is much better at home and I contribute that to the ze of the screen. It doesn't seem as overwhelming as the big screen theater and it is much eaer to take everything in. And now with the ability to play video games like "Call Of Duty: Black Ops" and "Killzone 3" in 3-D will open up a whole new level of video gaming.
There are nearly twice as many 3-D movies released this year over last year. 2012 looks like it will double again. "Thor" "Captain America" "The Green Lantern" "Priest" "Conan" and "Pirates Of The Caribbean" are just a few of the 3-D titles being released this summer.
To me the most disturbing part of this whole thing is converting older movies to 3-D. George Lucas is currently doing tests on his "Star Wars" saga. Peter Jackson has shown interest in converting both The "Lord Of The Rings" trilogy and
"King Kong" and James Cameron is converting "Titanic". The most shocking news I heard was that Baz Luhrmann is remaking "The Great Gatsby" in 3-D.
The 3 best movies based on 3-D quality
Avatar
Redent Evil: Afterlife
Sanctum
The 3 worst movies based on 3-D quality
Clash Of The Titans
The Last Airbender
The Green Hornet
Note: I in no way recommend any movie list above. Some are good, some are bad. That choice is yours.