Forums
Horror Movie Talk
Who Ya Gonna Call...
Ghostbuster's 3 is in the works.
SithLord
Tuesday 9/23/2008 at 04:39 AM | 19339
Read that was bullshit somewhere...forgot where though...lol
Are they really making another?
Are they really making another?
kweandee
Thursday 9/25/2008 at 10:57 AM | 19514
I hear something different ever day . .. one day the are . . the next they aren't . .. now it's back on again.
All I know is that Bill Murry swore he'd NEVER do another (I hope he's a liar
)
All I know is that Bill Murry swore he'd NEVER do another (I hope he's a liar
)
DaShape
Friday 9/26/2008 at 01:47 AM | 19533
Nope. It's back on. I heard the game that was suppose to come out, got scrapped.
SithLord
Friday 9/26/2008 at 06:21 AM | 19541
We call and Bill Murray answers!!! (how ironic eh?)
Bill Murray made a surprise appearance during a secret screening of City of Ember at Fantastic Fest. Now I’m kicking myself for having to leave early to Los Angeles to cover the big Disney even. Oh well. Murray was asked about Ghostbusters 3. For those who have been in a cave for the last month, The Office’s Gene Stupnitsky and Lee Eisenberg are writing a script which will introduce a new generation of Ghostbusters. We’ve heard Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis talk about the posble sequel, but to my knowlege, this is the first time Bill Murray has commented publicly. Here is what Murray had to say:“I think the wounds from Ghostbusters 2 have healed, Murray joked, the crowd errupting in laughter. “And supposedly they have hired two guys from The Office to write a script. So that could work. I think that’s a good idea to get a fresh look at… I always liked the characters. The characters are fun. And we did have a lot of fun making the movie. The first one was really a lot of fun to make. And I think the first 45 minutes of Ghostbusters is about as fun as a movie gets.”
Murray then offered advice to the new writers, a bit of a warning:“We didn’t have a lot of special effects in it. There were just a couple. It was just the funny characters in that world, and I like that movie because of it. The first movie had like 60 plate shots. The second movie had like hundreds. Those guys got their hands on the script early, and it was GONE. It went away. It was hard to wrangle because it was tied all around the effects without the story or the characters coming first. So, they are hard movies to write, and Dan really caught it with that first one.”
Bill Murray made a surprise appearance during a secret screening of City of Ember at Fantastic Fest. Now I’m kicking myself for having to leave early to Los Angeles to cover the big Disney even. Oh well. Murray was asked about Ghostbusters 3. For those who have been in a cave for the last month, The Office’s Gene Stupnitsky and Lee Eisenberg are writing a script which will introduce a new generation of Ghostbusters. We’ve heard Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis talk about the posble sequel, but to my knowlege, this is the first time Bill Murray has commented publicly. Here is what Murray had to say:“I think the wounds from Ghostbusters 2 have healed, Murray joked, the crowd errupting in laughter. “And supposedly they have hired two guys from The Office to write a script. So that could work. I think that’s a good idea to get a fresh look at… I always liked the characters. The characters are fun. And we did have a lot of fun making the movie. The first one was really a lot of fun to make. And I think the first 45 minutes of Ghostbusters is about as fun as a movie gets.”
Murray then offered advice to the new writers, a bit of a warning:“We didn’t have a lot of special effects in it. There were just a couple. It was just the funny characters in that world, and I like that movie because of it. The first movie had like 60 plate shots. The second movie had like hundreds. Those guys got their hands on the script early, and it was GONE. It went away. It was hard to wrangle because it was tied all around the effects without the story or the characters coming first. So, they are hard movies to write, and Dan really caught it with that first one.”
DaShape
Friday 9/26/2008 at 11:20 PM | 19577
murray is so correct about that, the first one didnt need so many effects it was great as it was, pt 2 was such a disappointment to me
Johnny Bisco
Saturday 9/27/2008 at 06:16 PM | 19636
I liked both but definately the first one was so much better
kweandee
Saturday 9/27/2008 at 08:36 PM | 19651
